Dr robert lee carbon dating
But it provides a non uniform worldview, separating religion from science.
Let’s now see if we cannot bring them together, at least for this “, creating a secondary cosmic ray in the form of an energetic neutron, and for these energetic neutrons to collide with nitrogen atoms.
in a spiritual hungry human create a cause to stumble?
I don’t think so, because real faith is not based on single scientific theories.
In order to “calibrate” the measurement in a accurate way we need to know the , meteors, sun cycles and sun radiation anomalies, volcanic eruptions would change the conditions drastically.
Our atmosphere and our solar system are not static.
There are gross discrepancies, the chronology is uneven and relative, and the accepted dates are actually selected dates. Instead of a few thousand years it will result in thousand of thousand years.
The carbon-14 decays with its half-life of 5,700 years, while the amount of carbon-12 remains constant in the sample.
And geology findings proves that in the past catastrophic events occurred, and despite this facts the radiocarbon dating is still considered a accurate dating method. 9-29 “, let’s call it the preflood atmospheric condition, got a low radiation and the production of C-14 was very low.No matter how “useful” it is though, the radiocarbon method is still not capable of yielding accurate and reliable results. Every attempt to use radiocarbon dating for artifacts deriving from the preflood world without the right calibration will result in a exaggerated dating.